The Cornell Legislation School website offers a range of information on legal topics, together with citation of case regulation, and in some cases delivers a video tutorial on case citation.

The court emphasised that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity with the offense demands the most stringent punishment, taking into consideration the sanctity of human life and deterrence for prospective offenders.

4.  It's been noticed by this Court that there is actually a delay of at some point inside the registration of FIR which has not been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness on the alleged incidence and also the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession in the petitioners has actually been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place for being the real brothers with the deceased but they didn't respond at all into the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is not any explanation as to why her arrest wasn't effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on lots of situations that extra judicial confession of an accused is actually a weak variety of evidence which may very well be manoeuvred by the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is also depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners together on a motorcycle at 4.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been of your view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally seem, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really subject matter to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion can be viewed as, however, we've been very clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, topic to availability of vacancy subject matter to your approval from the competent authority.

139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Offered the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're from the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally audio, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really matter to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case of the petitioners for promotion might be regarded as, however, we are apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, subject to availability of vacancy matter to the approval in the competent authority.

Please use one particular username and password established from the options. If it does not work please consider the other. Each allows single user access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have finished your session in Manupatra.

In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for your accused who intentionally murdered the sufferer.

Upholding Justice: The application from the regulation as well as subsequent punishment from the guilty party offer a perception of closure and justice to the victim’s family and loved types.

department concerned shall deliver the complete list of ACRs of the concerned officer to DPC well in advance cases more info for promotin(Promotion)

VI)     The petitioner is behind the bars considering the fact that arrest, investigation in the case is complete, he is no more essential with the purpose of investigation and at this stage to help keep him powering the bars before summary of trial will provide no valuable purpose.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to your person, by undertaking an act which from the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently hazardous that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death from the these kinds of person, is claimed to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”

A lower court may not rule against a binding precedent, even though it feels that it can be unjust; it may only express the hope that a higher court or even the legislature will reform the rule in question. If your court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the law evolve, it might either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts with the cases; some jurisdictions allow for any judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.